My mission statement

The times we are working in now need a great deal of accelerated change and there must be no negotiating that down. So my mission statement for this part of my consultancy career is to be clear that there needs to be and will be a lot of change from the work that I do with individuals and organisations and if organisations don’t want that, then it is probably best to go somewhere else.

Read my statement in full »

“First our Bill gives power to doctors and nurses” – but does it Mr Cameron? Does it?

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups, GPs, Health and Social Care Bill, Narrative of reform) by Paul on 16-02-2012

Yesterday I remarked on the distance between the Prime Minister’s narrative for the Health and Social Care Bill and the content of the actual Bill itself. I said that whilst it is essential for the Government to try and develop a narrative that can describe the Bill, the crucial thing is for the narrative to encompass the real content of the Bill – and not a fantasy. Read the rest of this entry »

“We will radically delayer and simplify the number of NHS bodies” (Health White Paper 2010)

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups, GP Commissioning, Health and Social Care Bill, Health and Well-being Boards, National Commissioning Board, Reform of the NHS, White Paper) by Paul on 31-01-2012

So how does this simplification look in respect of commissioning?

If you are a Tory MP you will look back to July 2010 and remember a White Paper which rang out loudly with some important truths about getting rid of bureaucracy in the NHS. At the time the Government was announcing its revolutionary plans to reform the NHS. Whilst no-one, including Tory MPs was too clear about what health care problem the reforms were meant to solve, they were at least clear that they wanted to remove layers of bureaucracy form the NHS. Read the rest of this entry »

Does the reform programme act as a diversion from the necessity to improve value in the NHS? Let’s look at commissioning…

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups, GP Commissioning, Health and Social Care Bill, Primary Care Trusts, World Class Commissioning) by Paul on 25-01-2012

Yesterday’s Health Select Committee report makes an important case against the Government’s NHS reforms. It argued that the reform programme has and will act as a diversion from the main task of improving value for money for the health service. Read the rest of this entry »

Implementing the Act – developing the commissioning organisations for NHS patients

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups, Health and Social Care Bill, National Commissioning Board, Reform of the NHS) by Paul on 18-01-2012

As I said on Monday, in a few months’ time the Government will look back at the struggle it had to get the Act through Parliament and see it as a really easy risk—free activity compared to its implementation.

By the time the Bill is passed there will be about a year left for most of its implementation to take place from 1 April 2013.

There is a lot of complex new activity to develop in that year. Read the rest of this entry »

The BMA’s legendary political consistency strikes again

Filed Under (BMA, Clinical Commissioning Groups, Primary Care Trusts) by Paul on 05-01-2012

Before Christmas I wrote a post that called into question the depth of the BMA’s love for current PCT staff. I pointed out that in their latest guidance they were extolling the virtues of current PCT staff to BMA members leading clinical commissioning groups as being the best experts in commissioning. I suggested that they were doing this because in the last couple of years they have become fearful of new private sector firms selling their services to GP led commission groups. Read the rest of this entry »

Q. When does the BMA seek to restrict the choices of its independent professional members?

Filed Under (BMA, Clinical Commissioning Groups, GP Commissioning, GPs) by Paul on 22-12-2011

A. When they might chose to do something with which the BMA disagrees.

Over the years the BMA, like any effective trade union, has always stood up for its member’s right to make their own choices. All trades unions do this and the BMA is assisted in this role by the professional autonomy training that all doctors receive.

Whilst this is true of all doctors, it is even truer for GPs because GPs have also traditionally run their own businesses. Therefore, as small business people, it has been up to them where they get their accountancy or legal advice from. Similarly it has been up to GPs to decide whom they might employ as receptionists or nurses. Read the rest of this entry »

Governance and commissioning in localities from now to April 2013.

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups, Local Government, National Commissioning Board) by Paul on 13-12-2011

Last Wednesday I ran a session with about 60 people in London, all of whom were involved in the governance of NHS commissioning over the next 16 months. As you can imagine, given the confusion around who is commissioning what, there was a broad range of different organisations represented. Most of them were non-executive directors of PCTs, PCT sub-clusters and PCT clusters. This led to much jesting about whether their title would have changed at the end of the meeting from the one they had at the beginning – a whole 2 hours later. (Yes I know – what a sad world I live in where this passes for jest!) Read the rest of this entry »

Developing both Health and Well-being Boards and how they work together.

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups, Health and Well-being Boards, Local Government, National Commissioning Board) by Paul on 07-12-2011

On Monday I spent the afternoon working with representatives of all of the local Public Health and Health and Well-being boards in North West London.

Two interesting issues arose from this experience.

The first was that local authorities across the sub-region are dedicating developmental time and effort to the process of taking on health improvement. They all recognise that to achieve this they will need to develop their Health and Well-being boards as the forum for discussion with clinical commissioning groups. Read the rest of this entry »

What direction are GP commissioners taking?

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups, GP Commissioning, GPs) by Paul on 05-12-2011

I spent last Thursday at the NHS Alliance Conference and heard from GP’s own mouths where they felt they were in terms of taking on NHS commissioning. This is not a random sample of GPs but represents a part of their leadership who want to take up commissioning.

The first thing it’s important to say is how keen nearly all of them are to take on the challenge of commissioning for their patients. Most of the GPs I met understood what this will entail, recognised that it’s going to be difficult and were generally realistic about the task. But they really want to do it. Read the rest of this entry »

Bullying and coercion. Is this the way to get the best out of CCGs?

Filed Under (Clinical Commissioning Groups) by Paul on 01-12-2011

On Tuesday I suggested that sooner or later GP organisations would recognise that they have a great deal of power over the way in which the Government could carry out its policy of GP led commissioning.

It is clear that the leadership of organisations such as the NHS Alliance and NAPC really want to make GP led commissioning work. But if they were to decide that the conditions that the National Commissioning Board are now constructing for that commissioning to take place would reduce the possibility of it working they could suggest that, unless those conditions change, they would walk away. Read the rest of this entry »

Switch to our mobile site